Micro, meso and macro issues emerging from focus group discussions: Contributions to a physiotherapy HIV curriculum
1 Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster
University, Hamilton, Canada
author: H Myezwa
Background. Physiotherapy in South Africa has not defined its contribution to the management of HIV. As part of developing an appropriate HIV/AIDS physiotherapy curriculum, focus group discussions (FGDs) with physiotherapy clinicians and educators were undertaken.
Objectives. To understand the perceptions and experiences of HIV management in refining an HIV physiotherapy curriculum.
Methods. Six focus groups chosen using purposive sampling ensured representation from experienced and newly qualified academics and clinicians. Interpretive content analysis strengthened the knowledge areas required in practice and attitudes based on the groups’ experiences of HIV management. Concepts were identified, and de- and recontextualised to develop categories and themes.
Results and discussion. Five themes emerged: the need to include HIV in the physiotherapy curriculum; a physiotherapy-specific HIV curriculum; co-ordinated curriculum design; underlying concerns relating to HIV management and inclusion in the curriculum; and the need for professional development. Further analysis and abstraction highlighted micro, meso and macro issues. Micro issues included content, while meso-level concerns included perceived gaps in the curriculum and recommendations to respond to issues such as therapists’ coping and burnout, therapists’ attitude to HIV, and organisational problems threatening the application of knowledge regarding this condition. At a macro level, participants felt that the political nature of HIV and curriculum structure were problematic and that there was a need for continuous staff development.
Conclusion. A list of topics related
to HIV, which tallied well with evidence in the literature and
patients’ clinical presentations, emerged. The need for a
complex, well-designed programme for the physiotherapy
management of HIV emerged and was informed by the difficulties
experienced at the micro, meso and macro levels of the
South Africa has a high HIV/AIDS prevalence, with a national
provincial mean of 18.1% (range 15.4 - 20.9%) in adults aged 15
- 49 years, with an interdistrict range of 5.3 - 46 %.1 Its high
prevalence and progression to a chronic condition highlight the
importance of its inclusion in all health professional education
programmes, including physiotherapy. HIV/AIDS is a pervasive
condition affecting most body systems. It therefore has
implications for physiotherapy education and practice. Its
chronic nature and relevance to physiotherapy, within the
framework of rehabilitation, are related to the restoration of
mobility and function.
To develop an appropriate HIV/AIDS physiotherapy
curriculum, an investigation of the interaction between HIV
patients and physiotherapists, an assessment of patient
problems, and an audit of the physiotherapy curricula of all
the training institutions in South Africa was undertaken.
The objective was to determine physiotherapists’ perceptions
of important HIV/AIDS curriculum topics to be included in
undergraduate physiotherapy programmes. Shepard and Jensen’s5
taxonomy of micro, meso and macro issues was used to guide the
investigation and data analysis. The macro environment
includes society, healthcare, higher education, and knowledge
related to physiotherapy, and therefore deals with large-scale
issues that influence the curriculum. Van den Akker6
defines the meso level as dealing with issues that affect
curriculum implementation at an operational level (Fig. 1).
The micro level addresses issues that
effect students’ clinical practice and reasoning,
including curriculum content.
Fig. 1. Schematic presentation of HIV curricula taxonomy.
A qualitative methodology, i.e. focus group discussions (FGDs),
was used to collect data. Clinicians and academics were
purposively chosen to describe their knowledge, experience,
beliefs and perception about HIV.7 The
clinicians were from three departments in hospitals with high
numbers of HIV-positive patients. Based on a curriculum
audit done at 8 universities,4 one of the participating
academic physiotherapy departments had an extensive HIV course.
Departments two and three had courses outlined with moderate and
limited content, respectively. Table 1 outlines the
characteristics of the sample
Sample and sampling
A total of 47 physiotherapists comprised academics and newly qualified and experienced clinicians, the focus group size ranging from 5 to 12 (Table 1).
The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of the Witwatersrand. Written permission was sought from the heads of the hospital departments and universities and all participants. Confidentiality was assured by all identifiers being excluded. Trustworthiness and transferability of the data were ensured by purposive sampling, consideration of the results of the preceding studies, data saturation and findings from the literature.4
Development of the interview guide
A literature review and the three studies described above were
used to develop the questions used in the focus groups. These
were then sent to two physiotherapists with expertise in HIV for
comment and validation.
In an initial pilot study two observers critiqued the way in
which the FGDs were conducted and suggested 4 further questions
and clarification of another. The results were used in the
study. The discussions were audio recorded and transcribed
verbatim by a professional transcriber.
Data analysis process
An interpretive content analysis using a constant comparison method was utilised to analyse the data.8 The transcribed data were analysed vertically and concepts were identified separately.9 After examination of the data, similar concepts were tallied around one phenomenon, i.e. categorised. Transcribed data were inspected in repeated rounds to tally similar concepts, ensure that no concepts were missed and identify new categories where necessary. The concepts of the first author and an independent researcher for all six sites as shown in Table 1 (attained a mean of 90% (SD ±2) (range 86 - 92%). Two experienced researchers were given the list of concepts and asked to provide a separate list of categories for comparison. Eleven of the 17 categories were congruent. Some of those not congruent were reworded or amalgamated with other categories. Once the categories were finalised, axial coding was done.10 The first author (HM), together with another qualitative researcher, discussed the links and the contextual associations of the categories. The categories were ranked and linkages identified. Member checking was done to ensure accuracy by sending the transcribed scripts with the concepts identified11 to the clinical and academic groups involved.
Themes were identified from the categories. The literature on curriculum design was used to further analyse the emerging themes. These themes were then assessed to determine whether they belonged to a micro, meso or macro environment,5 and are discussed as such.
This study ensured transferability by obtaining samples
from different settings. Credibility was achieved through
engagement in the FGDs, utilisation of the information from
examination of the conduct of the initial FGDs, subsequent
peer review and criticism allowing
improvement and clarity in the next FGDs. A rigorous process
of content analysis, with several layers of abstraction and
member checking by peers and participants, added to the
credibility of the study.
Results and discussion
Figs 1, 2 and 3 are a schematic presentation of all the findings. Further abstraction revealed how the specific content identified could be linked to the taxonomy of educational knowledge. Figs 2 and 3 relate to knowledge, attitude, practice and skills, and examples are given in Tables 2 - 4, representing the micro, meso and macro levels, respectively. Using further abstraction the researchers could link the specific course content proposed to curriculum input as well as the broader curricular issues that are illuminated by applying the micro, meso and macro taxonomy, as shown in Fig. 1.
For example, where participants expressed knowledge gaps
in areas such as neurology, when to exercise, implications for
exercise and the need for emotional support, further analysis
was undertaken. In the first analysis these aspects were
grouped under ‘needs’, as shown at the micro level. Successive
analyses separated the ‘needs’ relating to knowledge and other
categories, such as coping, and further abstraction was done.5 In
addition, the information elicited was compared with patient
needs from the previous study4 as well as the
literature, and omissions were identified. Figs 2 and 3 show
the results of this process.
Fig. 2. Micro level. Results of secondary analysis.
Fig. 3. Meso and macro levels. Results of secondary analysis.
Physiotherapy course content at the various levels
The micro level ‘Physiotherapy content needs’ showed a wide
range of topics under 5 main themes, i.e. factual knowledge and
information, application of knowledge, skills, thinking skills
and application, information analysis and application. Table 2
outlines these micro-level needs for one theme for physiotherapy
Remaining themes. Under the theme application, categorised under treatment approaches, were: physiotherapy management, concepts such as the relationship between CD4 counts v. mobility/function, effective physiotherapy interventions, when to exercise, dealing with general weakness, self-protection, and counselling.
Knowledge application and philosophy included the role of physiotherapy in HIV and the need for inclusion of physiotherapy-related management principles.
Information analysis and application of understanding included aspects such as HIV aetiology and prognosis, medical treatment, prognostic information and changes, understanding overall management, treatment, ARV therapy and its secondary complications, and public health implications, e.g. prevention efforts and community implications for HIV. Although the pathology concerning physiotherapists was elicited from the literature, the FGDs highlighted how pathology specifically interplays with HIV and issues specifically related to this condition, such as recurrence of illness, HIV staging in relation to physiotherapy, disclosure, case variation and comorbidities. A quote from one of the participants illustrates some of the difficulties: ‘There’s such emphasis on strokes and on paraplegia and all of that, and you come here and so many of the patients you see have peripheral neuropathies … transverse myelitis and painful feet, peripheral neuropathy … myopathy.’
Topics that emerged from the FGDs were similar to those described in the literature,12-14 i.e. physiotherapy content, prognosis, prevention, counselling and large-scale implications of HIV. The FGDs highlighted the need for factual knowledge on pathology and management of impairments and understanding HIV presentation, particularly its episodic nature, how ARVs affect presentation and staging, as well as disclosure issues. These were considered to be gaps in the curriculum that complicate the application of HIV knowledge.
Clinical therapists explained how poor disclosure made it difficult to tackle real issues if the patient was unwilling to openly discuss their HIV status,15 as stated here: ‘The difficult part is that often the patient himself doesn’t know that he’s positive. They often find that out … when he’s already in hospital and you’re not supposed to talk about it. But it’s a policy, a national issue. I haven’t come up with a plan to help tackle it. At this juncture we are a bit under pressure to follow regulations.’
The ‘state of non-disclosure may instil the fear of being infected into physiotherapists’.16 Physiotherapists’ responses to HIV should be enhanced by more sensitive training/practice, and some of these issues were evident in the meso-level concerns.
Physiotherapists wish to play an active part in the management of patients with HIV/AIDS and indicated the need for the curriculum to clearly define the role of the therapist in HIV management, including specific roles in a rehabilitative versus palliative setting and acute versus chronic patient management. Furthermore, clinicians needed clarity on the principles governing treatment of HIV patients and effective evidence-based physiotherapy interventions. The application of rehabilitation models, principles and ethics in the management of HIV/AIDS is also an important aspect of defining HIV rehabilitation.17 One recently qualified participant said: ‘Uhm, the way that I treat my patients is, I tell the truth as much as I possibly can. I talk about the side effects, I talk about everything and I think if everybody was trained in that, if the physio sees a patient and thinks ag, this patient had a stroke, they’re a goner, and I can’t be bothered ...’.
This information points to the need for a comprehensive approach to the management of HIV patients, including prevention, treatment and a professional and an empathetic disposition towards people with HIV/AIDS. Counselling was also seen as important for comprehensive patient management, but was absent. The benefits have been well documented in the literature18 (Tables 2 - 4).
Other missing components were the determinants of HIV disease, staging of HIV, physiotherapy management approaches, and a patient screening system. The effect of HIV on body systems and their interplay must also be included in the curriculum, e.g. the effect of HIV on both the pulmonary and haematological systems and its contribution to dyspnoea (Tables 2 - 4).
Some academics mentioned the need to include the effect
of exercise on HIV, and clinicians felt that a clearer
position and guiding principles on implementation programmes
for exercise and function were needed. There was an unclear
link to clinical reasoning in areas such as function and
I have seen that people with a CD4 of 150 are non-functional
and others with a CD4 of 2 are up and about’.
Understanding the true
prognosis of HIV was seen as an important prerequisite to
managing HIV, as it has profound effects on the attitudes and
affective consequences experienced by therapists.
Meso-level issues can potentially affect the implementation of
a curriculum if not carefully incorporated at the planning
stage. Four themes emerged that were directly related to gaps in
the curriculum: issues related to personnel, i.e. coping and
burn-out; perception; attitude; and structural threats. Table 3
describes one section of the content. Other themes under the
meso level are outlined below.
Remaining themes. Personal attitudes to HIV/AIDS: clinicians and academics admitted their knowledge gaps regarding HIV and its prognosis, with the predominant perception of HIV being a death sentence. Some academics perceived the inclusion of HIV/AIDS as a threat and as interference in their undergraduate training programme.
Structural and organisational threats, e.g. in one academic institution medical personnel – not physiotherapists – determined the HIV content for the physiotherapy curriculum. In addition, clinicians found clinical decision-making difficult because of high HIV patient loads. With such large numbers of HIV patients, ethical issues and value judgements presented problems that can be addressed in the curriculum.
Under the theme current gaps in knowledge, some practitioners thought that topics such as HIV staging were theoretical and not practical. One clinician said: ‘HIV is so all-encompassing, it takes bits and pieces from so many different areas of physiotherapy: from neurology, the respiratory, when you get patients who end up with TB signs, all sorts of things. To draw everything together would be useful.’
On a personal level, coping and therapist burn-out were experienced with both psychomotor and affective effects, i.e. loss of hope and morale, physiotherapy worthiness, and the effects of HIV. The lack of clarity of the physiotherapist’s role seems to result in a dilemma where practitioners question the extent of their patient management. Clarity of roles is important for professionals’ ability to advocate and place themselves in the management continuum of a condition as well as having the confidence to market their professional contribution.17 Puckree et al.19 suggested more practical education on the physiotherapist’s role and clinical practice on how to handle patients with HIV. The episodic nature of HIV requires that the therapist is aware of this constant flux and its effect on their management roles.20
Finally, the application of appropriate attitudes and behaviours included counselling, disclosure and clinical decision making. Table 2 shows how personal attitudes play an important role in determining the management of persons living with HIV/AIDS. Therapists battle with their own perceptions of HIV being a death sentence, with being judgemental and with their own beliefs regarding HIV. The perception was that lecturers exhibit their personal attitudes in the way they teach the subject. ‘I think a lot of the time we actually get taught in a way that [whispers] [name] is HIV positive. You know, like, if we just get told a bit more positively … [clinician].
All studies on the inclusion of HIV in the curriculum
have shown that training diminishes negative attitudes,
enhances willingness to treat, promotes appropriate practice
behaviour and contributes towards becoming a more
patient-centred health provider.21-23
Therefore, the macro-level effect on an HIV curriculum is
important as it may help to obtain a better understanding of
the condition, how to implement training and how to solve some
of the attitudinal problems.
Four themes emerged here: curriculum structure; whether it should include large-scale implications; need for an HIV curriculum; and continuous training and development.
Table 4 outlines one of the macro-level themes and categories.
Macro-level issues include society, the healthcare environment, the higher education system and the knowledge related to physiotherapy, therefore dealing with large-scale implications influencing a curriculum.5 Participants supported an integrated, evidence-based curriculum. A mixed position was evident in ‘how to’ include HIV in the curriculum and ‘how much’ information there should be. One of the supporting views for an integrated topic is: ‘When it stood on its own, I didn’t understand the connections with the physiotherapy profession. I mean it was, like, Greek [clinician].’
The pervasive nature of HIV, which affects all body systems, supports its integration into all topics of the curriculum and not being a ‘stand-alone’ topic. Newly qualified clinicians were surprised at how many patients were HIV positive, irrespective of diagnosis, and emphasised the need to integrate HIV into all fields being taught. No literature could be identified that describes the advantages or disadvantages of integrating a pervasive condition into an educational curriculum. However, the complexity of HIV/AIDS has been recognised through the need to address its social, biological and ethical perspectives.23 HIV is transcendent in that it affects all aspects of human life, requiring a comprehensive approach. However, participants cautioned on the danger of ‘overkill’: ‘Careful about overkill. You mustn’t be repeating the same thing … .’ While an academic said, ‘I wanted to say it’s actually very difficult to make it a subject on its own because it’s actually duplicating – it should be incorporated in each specific field’.
Reservations with regard to overloading of the physiotherapy curriculum are not surprising as this is an expected reaction to change. Jones et al.,24 in assessing the response to curricular change in medical schools, reported that change is compromised by resistance to change and the need for a high degree of autonomy among faculty members. Nevertheless, results show that efforts are being made to include HIV in all universities represented in these focus groups. 2 Two other themes emerged relating to the perception of HIV management as a political issue and that it should be left to education authorities.
Much animated debate took place in all 6 groups on whether there was a need to include HIV in the curriculum, with one group proposing that the physiotherapy curriculum was not responding to the clinical setting: ‘There are so many different presentations that often they come up with the strangest, newest, weirdest presentations that are unbelievable’. Generally, political desirability and the obligation to be informed about HIV were important reasons given for curricular inclusion of HIV, supported by the following quotes by academics: ‘I think it’s actually expected of us ... it’s a political issue’. ‘My opinion, I don’t think it must be in the curriculum. Not necessarily in the curriculum but I think it must be part of the Department of Education’s something ?’ A position such as this does not give the impression of developing curriculum programmes that respond to changes in a macro environment. Some participants strongly supported the inclusion of large-scale implications and called for better co-ordination of content.
Practitioners and academic staff established a link between their role as therapists and the impact of managing HIV, but seemed to be in a state of confusion about how to implement this. The foregoing may be attributed to some physiotherapists having little understanding of social determinants and being entrenched in the medical model of management. HIV/AIDS profoundly affects the entire individual and is complex, is stigmatised and has socio-economic implications. It therefore calls for professionals, including physiotherapists, to fully embrace a biopsychosocial paradigm for managing these patients.25 , 26
A central theme emerging from the FGDs is that clinicians and academics felt it was important to include HIV/AIDS into the physiotherapy curriculum. There were, however, two strongly non-aligned views: those who felt it was important to limit the role to traditional training, and the opposing view of a professional trained within an environmentally and politically sensitive context.
The complexity of shared experiences, opinions, misconceptions
and gaps in knowledge of both clinicians and academics revealed
the need for a complex well-designed programme for the
physiotherapy management of HIV. Some of the difficulties
experienced revealed a range of meso- and macro-level issues
that may affect the content and implementation of a curriculum
in which the management of HIV is fully integrated into all
fields. These FGDs elicited contextually specific input that
added to the information obtained from the literature and an
evidence-based patient profile. The list of topics that emerged
was taken to the next level of validation for a contextually
informed HIV curriculum tested for consensus using a Delphi
We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Medical
Research Council of South Africa (MRC) and the Carnegie Trust
1. UNAIDS. World AIDS report. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2009.
2. Myezwa H. Mainstreaming HIV into physiotherapy curriculum. PhD thesis. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, 2008.
3. Myezwa H, Stewart A, Mbambo N, et al. Status of referral to physiotherapy among HIV positive patients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2005. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2005;63:27-31.
4. Myezwa H, Stewart A, Musenge E, et al. Assessment of HIV-positive in-patients using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ( ICF), at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg. African Journal of AIDS Research 2009;8:93-106. [http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/AJAR.2009.8.1.10.723]
5. Shepard KF, Jensen G. Handbook for Teaching Physical Therapists. Woburn, USA: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002.
6. Van den Akker JJH. Curriculum perspecticves: An introduction. In: Van den Akker J, Kuiper W, Hameyer U, eds. Curriculum Landsacape and Trends. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Aademic Publishers, 2003.
7. Babbie E, Mouton J. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2003.
8. Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st century. In: Denzin N, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, 2000:507-535.
9. Tesch R. The Mechanics of Interpretational Qualitative Analysis. Qualitative Research Analysis Types and Soft Ware Tools. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press, 1992.
10. Macallan DC. Wasting in HIV infection and AIDS. J Nutr 1999;129:238-242.
11. Kielhofner G. Research in Occupational Therapy: Methods of Inquiry for Enhancing Practice. Philadelphia: Davis, 2006.
12. Balogun JA, Kaplan MT, Miller TM. The effect of professional education on knowledge and attitudes of physical therapist and occupational therapist students about acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Physical Therapy 1998;78:1073-1083.
13. Puckree T, Chetty BJ, Govender V, et al. Are physiotherapy graduates adequately prepared to manage HIV/AIDS patients? South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2004;60:7-10.
14. Schlotfeldt P, Potterton J. Physiotherapy students knowledge and attitudes to the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, 2002.
15. Myezwa H, Stewart A, Solomon P, et al. Topics on HIV/AIDS for inclusion into a physical therapy curriculum: Consensus through a modified delphi technique. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 2012;26:50-62.
16. Salati F. The knowledge and attitudes of PTs towards patients with HIV/AIDS in Lusaka Province, Zambia. Cape Town: University of the Western Cape, 2004.
17. Solomon P, Guenter D, Salvatori P. Integration of persons with HIV in a problem-based tutorial: A qualitative study. Teach Learn Medical 2003;15:257-261. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_08]
18. The Voluntary HIV 1 Counseling Testing Study Group. Efficacy of voluntary HIV 1 counselling and testing in individuals and couples in Kenya, Tanzania and Trinidad: A randomised control trial. Lancet 2000;356:103-112. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02446-6]
19. Puckree T, Chetty B, Govender V, et al. Physiotherapists and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome: Knowledge and prevention. A study in Durban, South Africa. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2002;25(3):231-234. [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200209000-00009]
20. O’Brien K, Davis A, Strike C, Young N, Bayoumi A. Putting Disability into Context. Factors that Influence the Experiences of ‘Disability’ for Adults Living with HIV/AIDS. Vancouver, Canada: WCPT, 2007.
21. Seacat JP, Inglehart MR. Education about treating patients with HIV infections/AIDS: The student perspective. Journal of Dental Education 2003;67:630-640.
22. Held SL. The effects of an AIDS education program on the knowledge and attitudes of a physical therapy class. Physical Therapist 1993;73:156-164.
23. Solomon P, Salvatori P, Guenter D. Interprofessional professional problem-based learning course on rehabilitation issues in HIV. Medical Teacher 2003;25:408-413. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000137418]
24. Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, et al. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001;357:699-703. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04134-9]
25. Worthington C, Myers T, O’Brien K, et al. Rehabilitation in HIV/AIDS: Development of an expanded conceptual framework. AIDS Patient Care & STDs 2005;19:258-271. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/apc.2005.19.258]
26. Eisner EW. Curriculum Ideologies. The Educational Imagination. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992:47-107.
Full text views: 27919